As a historian, I often feel complicit in a certain fetishization of major moments and figures in American history. Celebrations of independence day,armistice day, presidents’ day, Jackie Robinson day—even the eponymous subject of Annette Gordon-Reed’s important new book On Juneteenth—demand that historians interrogate and contextualize the marquee events and tipping points of thenation’s past, alongside the key individuals that made those moments possible. And much of the time, we are more than happy, either through critique or memorialization, to oblige. After all, it’snot every day that the public cares what we have to say.
And yet, embedded in the impulse to celebrate these big moments is an assumption that these moments are the moments that matter, the stuff of which history is made. And that is an assumption that many of us don’t actually believe. Indeed, historians of all people tend to be the first to recognize the import of the real work that happened after the big moments for which we have parades, as well as the plurality of often underrecognized individuals who actually did that work. Our public celebrations tend to ignore that the building of the nation continued into 1777, for example. Or that June 20th, 1865 was the first day in the rest of a still-ongoing century-and-a-half struggle for the rights of formerly enslaved Americans and their descendants. Or that Jackie Robinson and the black players that followed him into the majors after his 1947 debut all still took grounders and went to batting practice before every game in 1948, 1949,and so on. In each case, the world looked different the day or the year after the thing we celebrate. But those worlds of the past were uncertain worlds —worlds informed by the events that preceded them, but also worlds of contingency that continued to require a making of their own.
As I look at the upcoming academic year, I can’t help but think of 1777; of June 20th, 1865; of baseball in1948. On a national scale, the “Pandemic Year” of2020-2021 is over — as is the 2020 election, and some of the acute political violence that came with it.And yet we continue to live and work through a time of great uncertainty, both in terms of the present and future of the ongoing COVID crisis and in terms ofracially-inflected threats to voting and other democratic institutions. Closer to home, those uncertainties require that we navigate an academic semester that, while perhaps not marked by the same acute crises as the fall of 2020, still looks quite different from the “normal” that we might have hoped, in optimistic moments, to have returned to. Instead, 2021-22 is the year where we take what we have, with all its uncertainties, and start to build the new normal.
For the history department, that new normal starts with the same commitment to a rigorous and inclusive exploration of the past that has shaped what we do for at least as long as I have been here (which is now approaching a decade). Throughout the past eighteen months in particular, that unflinching commitment to a liberal arts history education has driven dynamic and creative responses among the department’s faculty and students to the changing conditions of the pandemic. As chair, I am deeply proud of our collective accomplishments in the face of multiple,overlapping crises, and optimistic about our prospects even amidst the uncertainties of the new academic year.
Among the ranks of the faculty, we are happy to welcome Visiting Assistant Professor Francisco Beltràn for the 2021-22 academic year. Francisco will teach courses in 20th Century U.S. History, including exciting courses on Latinx History, Race in 20th Century America, Immigration History, and Oral History while Professor Jackie Dirks goes on a well-deserved sabbatical. You can read Francisco’s thoughts about the relevance of history at this moment in his piece “What Is Going On?” in this newsletter (pg. 4). Meanwhile, the department also prepares to see an old hand off to new things,celebrating the long and impressive Reed career of our colleague Professor Doug Fix, who will retire at the end of the 2021-22 academic year. For an overview of some of Doug’s many accomplishments, take a look at the profile by Annie Jiang (’21) on pg.9. Finally, we applaud Professor Mary Ashburn Miller,who has taken the reigns of the college’s Center for Teaching and Learning this year. Not to worry, however; Mary will continue to teach courses in History and Humanities—and advise history seniors!— even as she helps the faculty as a whole to develop as effective liberal arts teachers in a dynamic and challenging educational landscape.
Speaking of seniors, we are excited to welcome 12 majors to the thesis ranks this fall. Professor Margot Minardi will once again head up our monthly “Thesis Friday” sessions to support our seniors as they embark on the capstone of their careers as Reed history majors. The department will also once again host our annual Wallace T. MacCaffrey Lecture. Thisyear’s speaker will be Michelle McKinley, the Bernard B. Kliks Professor of Law & Director of the Center for the Study of Women in Society at the University of Oregon. You can read more about Professor McKinley’s MacCaffrey lecture on pg. 3.
Finally, as always, we historians have still been reading! Take a look at what students, faculty, and alumni in the Reed History community have been up to in our “What Are You Reading?” section on pg. 8.
The fall semester is upon us, and I am excited to see students back in the classroom as we get back to the work of exploring sources, honing critical writing skills, and feeding the wonder and curiosity that comes with teaching and doing history at the college. The present is uncertain. The future is unpredictable. It’s a great time to be a historian.
All the best,
Your Humble Chair,
Josh Howe